Head to head · irons
Wilson Staff Model CB vs Ping i540.
The consensus calls this one close: 87 to 86. The right pick comes down to which club's weaknesses you can live with.
87
Strongly recommended
Wilson Staff Model CB
Blade looks, softer and easier than the MB
5 reviewers · unanimous
+Super soft forged feel
+Astonishing spin and distance consistency
−Top line thicker than the MB
86
Strongly recommended
Ping i540
Slender players iron that bombs it
6 reviewers · unanimous
+Big distance and ball speed gains
+High launch keeps stopping power
−Firm, clicky sound
The tape.
No reviewer has filmed these two head-to-head yet. Here is the tape on each.
- The Most Hyped Iron of 2026 Has A Problem!!Alex Etches · on the Wilson Staff Model CBWatch
- Top 5 BEST Irons For Mid-Low Handicappers in 2024!Dan Hendriksen · on the Wilson Staff Model CBWatch
- The Most Underrated Irons Of 2026?Golf Monthly · on the Wilson Staff Model CBWatch
- PING i540 IRONS | Incredible Distance Consistency! | The Swing Report2nd Swing Golf · on the Ping i540Watch
- PING i540: These are CHEATING!Mark Crossfield · on the Ping i540Watch
- Which New Ping Iron Is Best For You?National Club Golfer · on the Ping i540Watch
More head-to-heads
- Wilson Staff Model Blade vs Wilson Staff Model CB85·87
- Ping Blueprint S vs Wilson Staff Model CB90·87
- Mizuno Pro M15 vs Wilson Staff Model CB90·87
- Titleist T250 vs Ping i54092·86
- Wilson Staff Model Blade vs Ping i54085·86
- Mizuno Pro M15 vs Ping i54090·86
- Ping Blueprint S vs Ping i54090·86
- Wilson Staff Model CB vs Tour Edge Exotics CB Forged87·84