Head to head · putters
L.A.B. Link 2.1 vs L.A.B. Link.1.
The consensus calls this one close: 79 to 75. The right pick comes down to which club's weaknesses you can live with.
79
Strongly recommended
L.A.B. Link 2.1
Zero-torque tech in a real blade
4 reviewers · unanimous
+Looks like a traditional blade
+Milled stainless feels great
−Thin, doesn't look forgiving
75
Well liked
L.A.B. Link.1
Zero-torque tech in a blade shape
2 reviewers · unanimous
+Lie-angle-balance in a blade
+Mallet-like stability, small head
−Hard transition from a blade release
The tape.
More head-to-heads
- L.A.B. Link 2.1 vs L.A.B. Link 2.279·71
- L.A.B. Link.1 vs L.A.B. Link 2.275·71
- L.A.B. DF3i vs L.A.B. OZ.1i HS89·85
- L.A.B. DF3i vs L.A.B. DF389·87
- L.A.B. OZ.1i HS vs L.A.B. DF385·87
- Kirkland Signature Putter vs Kirkland Signature Ball81·85
- L.A.B. VZN.1i vs L.A.B. OZ.1i85·84
- TaylorMade Spider ZT 5K vs L.A.B. OZ.1i81·84