Head to head · putters
L.A.B. Link 2.1 vs L.A.B. Link 2.2.
The consensus gives L.A.B. Link 2.1 the edge, 79 to 71. Here is what the reviewers who tested both actually found.
79
Strongly recommended
L.A.B. Link 2.1
Zero-torque tech in a real blade
4 reviewers · unanimous · consensus edge
+Looks like a traditional blade
+Milled stainless feels great
−Thin, doesn't look forgiving
71
Well liked
L.A.B. Link 2.2
A forgiving, great-looking gateway L.A.B. putter
4 reviewers · split
+Sharp, industrial good looks
+Soft feel and beautiful roll
−Soft face needs a firmer stroke
The tape.
- LAB LINK 2.1 & 2.2 PUTTERS | The Swing Report2ndswing · tested both on cameraWatch ↗
- The Most SHOCKING L.A.B Putter EVER MADE!JamesRobinsonGolf · tested both on cameraWatch ↗
- Which Zero Torque Putter is Right for You? L.A.B Golf LINK 2.2 ,L.A.B Golf 2.1 & L.A.B Golf LINK.1TodaysGolfer · tested both on cameraWatch ↗
More head-to-heads
- Titleist GT280 vs Titleist GTS30088·81
- MacGregor Tourney Max 3-Wood vs MacGregor Tourney Max 5-Wood81·81
- Callaway Quantum Max Irons vs Callaway Quantum Max OS81·85
- Cleveland CBX vs Cleveland CBX Full-Face81·81
- Vice Boost Plus Driver vs Vice Boost Plus Putter81·81
- TaylorMade P790 (2025) vs Titleist T25088·92
- TaylorMade TP5 Stripe vs TaylorMade TP5x Stripe85·81
- L.A.B. DF3i vs L.A.B. OZ.1i HS89·85